1.0MiB Lawhttp://www.miblaw.com/lawschoolAndrewhttp://www.miblaw.com/lawschool/author/admin/White v. Muniz - 999 P.2d 814 (Colo. 2000) -rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="2DN48h4OXZ"><a href="http://www.miblaw.com/lawschool/white-v-muniz/">White v. Muniz – 999 P.2d 814 (Colo. 2000)</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="http://www.miblaw.com/lawschool/white-v-muniz/embed/#?secret=2DN48h4OXZ" width="600" height="338" title="“White v. Muniz – 999 P.2d 814 (Colo. 2000)” — MiB Law" data-secret="2DN48h4OXZ" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=http://www.miblaw.com/lawschool/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
Case name for White v. Muniz. Issue: Whether an intentional tort requires some proof that the tortfeasor not only intended to contact another person, but also intended that the contact be harmful or offensive to the other person.